Compare

Looking for a Facilio alternative? Here's an honest one.

FrostLogic Explore is a sensor intelligence layer, not a CMMS. If work orders and maintenance execution are the job, Facilio still wins that. Here's exactly where each one is the right pick.

Or book a time directly
  • Updated August 2026
  • Claims from Facilio's own published materials
  • EU buyer's perspective

Why compare us to a CMMS

Facilio and Explore aren't quite the same product. That's the point.

Anyone researching a Facilio alternative is usually trying to solve one of two different problems, and Facilio and FrostLogic Explore answer different ones. Facilio is a Connected CMMS: work orders, preventive-maintenance scheduling, vendor and tenant workflows, and finance tracking, with energy optimization and rule-based fault detection built in as a module. Explore is built the other way round. It reads your BMS, meters, and IoT sensors, and returns a ranked queue of what to fix and why. It does not run maintenance operations.

So the real question isn't which platform is better. It's which problem you actually have. If you already run a CMMS you're happy with and the gap is analysis depth, Explore is worth a look, which is what most buyers weighing Facilio alternatives are actually testing for. If the real problem is that findings die before they become a work order, Facilio's auto-generated work orders close that loop today in ways Explore doesn't.

Head to head

FrostLogic Explore and Facilio, and who each one is actually for.

FrostLogic Explore

Best for teams that want the deepest read on what's happening before anything becomes a work order

Explore is ours, so read this entry knowing that. It runs six anomaly-detection methods with causal filtering, forecasts every tracked metric one hour to seven days ahead with confidence bounds, and tracks BREEAM, LEED, and Nordic Swan criteria against live data continuously rather than at audit time. The Frostdynamics engine lets you simulate a change before anyone touches the building. Hosting is in the EU on Hetzner or in your own cluster, and your data and trained models are exportable from day one. Read-only, always.

The boundary: Explore recommends. It does not run work orders, PM scheduling, or vendor and tenant workflows today. If closing the loop into maintenance execution is the priority, that's Facilio, below.

Facilio

Best for teams that want a prediction to become assigned work automatically

Facilio, founded in 2017, is a Connected CMMS: maintenance, PM scheduling, work orders, and vendor, tenant, and finance workflows, with energy optimization and rules-based fault detection built in as modules. The company cites 25,000 buildings and over 100 million square feet under management, connecting over BACnet/IP, Modbus, OPC UA, and Niagara. Customers include ICD Brookfield, British Land, Aster Hospitals, and Investa, with a strong Middle East facilities-management presence. Verdantix named Facilio a Green Quadrant Leader for commercial-buildings CMMS in September 2025, its Atom AI agents shipped in February 2026, and July 2026 brought an AI-native CMMS release with prompt navigation and an MCP server. The AI suite is priced from $25,000 a year, per their published pricing, with predictive features gated to the Enterprise tier.

The boundary: Facilio has no published EU data-residency commitment, and its fault detection is rules-based rather than the causal, physics-grounded depth Explore or Clockworks Analytics run. Buying it means buying the full CMMS, whether you use the workflow modules or not.

Weighing other Facilio competitors too? Clockworks Analytics is the closest pure-diagnostics peer to Explore, and BrainBox AI or Nuuka take the autonomous-control route instead of recommending. See the full field in our best building energy management software comparison.

Side by side

Facilio vs FrostLogic Explore, in one table.

FrostLogic Explore and Facilio, compared on focus, AI behaviour, forecasting, certification tracking, maintenance execution, data residency and pricing.
FrostLogic ExploreFacilio
Core focusSensor intelligence layer: ranked decision queue across BMS, meters, IoTConnected CMMS: maintenance, work orders, vendor and tenant workflows
How the AI actsRecommends; your team decidesRules-based fault detection; auto-generates work orders
Forecasting1 hour to 7 days ahead, with confidence boundsNot a core feature
Certification complianceContinuous: BREEAM, LEED, Nordic SwanSustainability reporting module
Maintenance executionNot part of Explore todayCore product: auto-assigned work orders
EU data residencyYes (Hetzner, GDPR-native) or self-hostedNo published commitment
PricingPer building, on requestAI suite from $25,000/year; predictive tier Enterprise-only

Facilio claims come from facilio.com and Facilio's published materials as of August 2026. "Not published" means we could not find it, which is not proof it does not exist.

Transparent pricing, no sales call to see it

See FrostLogic Explore pricing

Before you shortlist

Five questions that settle Facilio vs Explore faster than any comparison.

Ask these on the first call with either vendor, including us. The field narrows itself fast.

  1. Is the gap the maintenance workflow, or the analysis feeding it? If findings already reach the right person and get acted on, you don't need a CMMS, you need better analysis. If they don't, that's a workflow problem no analytics layer solves on its own.

  2. Do you want the platform to act, or to recommend? Facilio can auto-generate and assign a work order. Explore never writes to anything; it hands your team a ranked queue and lets them decide. Match the choice to how much you want to hand off.

  3. Can either vendor explain one flagged finding back to the data, live? Pick a specific alert in the demo and ask them to trace it to the underlying signal. An answer that stops at "the model flagged it" will stop there in production too.

  4. Where does the data live? Get the residency commitment in writing. Facilio has no published EU data-residency commitment. Explore is EU-hosted on Hetzner or self-hosted. Ask for the actual terms, not the sales-deck version.

  5. Are you buying a CMMS you don't need, or do you already have one you like? If you already run a CMMS and like it, Facilio means paying for overlap. If you don't have one and want the workflow closed automatically, that's exactly what it's built for.

For the wider field, read our best building energy management software comparison.

Before you ask

Facilio vs FrostLogic Explore, the questions we get.

Not if you need CMMS-grade execution: work orders, PM scheduling, vendor and tenant workflows. Facilio still wins that outright. If the gap is analysis depth rather than maintenance operations, Explore is worth a look, and it can sit on top of the CMMS you already run rather than replace it.

Facilio is a Connected CMMS with energy optimization and fault detection built in as a module. Explore is a sensor intelligence layer that reads your BMS, meters, and IoT sensors and returns a ranked decision queue. Facilio runs maintenance operations. Explore does not.

No, and we don't claim it does. Explore complements a CMMS. It doesn't compete with the workflow layer, and it has no work-order, PM-scheduling, or field-service capability.

Facilio has no published EU data-residency commitment. The company is headquartered in New York, with offices in Dubai, Chennai, Singapore, and Sydney. FrostLogic Explore is EU-hosted on Hetzner, or self-hosted, and built GDPR-native.

Facilio's AI suite is priced from $25,000 a year per their published pricing, with predictive features gated to the Enterprise tier. FrostLogic Explore is priced per building, on request.

Clockworks Analytics is a good shortlist addition for pure HVAC diagnostics. BrainBox AI or Nuuka fit better if autonomous control is the goal rather than recommendations. Our best building energy management software comparison covers the full roundup.

See the decision queue on your own building.

Book a 20-minute demo on your own data, or start with the free Building Intelligence Score. Either way, we'll tell you straight whether Explore is the right fit, or whether Facilio's workflow closes the loop you actually need.