Compare

Looking for a Myrspoven alternative? Here's one that doesn't touch your controls.

FrostLogic Explore and Myrspoven's myCoreAI both watch a building around the clock, but myCoreAI writes new setpoints back into your HVAC roughly every fifteen minutes while Explore only recommends and leaves your team in control. Myrspoven is a Stockholm-founded, Vinnova-backed specialist with named case studies behind its savings claims. Here's exactly where each one is the right pick.

Talk it throughGet your Building Intelligence Score
Or book a time directly
  • Updated August 2026
  • Claims from Myrspoven's own published materials
  • EU buyer's perspective

Why we're comparing ourselves to a Vinnova-backed HVAC specialist

Myrspoven and Explore agree a building should be read constantly. They disagree about who gets to act on what it finds.

Anyone researching a Myrspoven alternative has probably already seen the case studies. Myrspoven is a Stockholm-founded company whose flagship product, myCoreAI, grew out of a Vinnova-backed research project with Stockholm property company SISAB to test whether AI could autonomously control a building's HVAC. Unlike most vendors in this category, Myrspoven names the buildings behind its savings claims rather than quoting a bare average.

The boundary is who's allowed to act on that data. myCoreAI writes new setpoints back into the HVAC and BMS roughly every fifteen minutes, the same closed-loop model BrainBox AI, Nuuka, and Kiona run. FrostLogic Explore reads your BMS, meters, and IoT sensors and hands your team a ranked queue instead; it never writes a command back. Myrspoven's own privacy policy states data is processed in Sweden, inside the EU, though it doesn't publish certification-tracking or pricing details the way it publishes its case studies. If you manage a portfolio rather than a single building, Explore's vendor-neutral read of every BMS in the estate is built for that from day one.

Head to head

FrostLogic Explore and Myrspoven myCoreAI, and who each one is actually for.

FrostLogic Explore

Best for teams that want proof they can trace back to a signal, without handing HVAC control to software

Explore is ours, so read this entry knowing that. It runs six anomaly-detection methods with causal filtering, forecasts every tracked metric one hour to seven days ahead with confidence bounds, and tracks BREEAM, LEED, and Nordic Swan criteria continuously rather than at audit time. Hosting is in the EU on Hetzner or in your own cluster, and your data and trained models are exportable from day one. Read-only, always.

The boundary: Explore never writes a command to your equipment. If you want a system that adjusts HVAC on its own and can point to named case studies doing it, Myrspoven, below, already does it.

Myrspoven myCoreAI

Best for HVAC-heavy buildings that want a Nordic specialist with named, published savings and don't mind the system writing its own commands

Myrspoven is a Stockholm-founded company whose flagship product, myCoreAI, optimizes heating, cooling, and ventilation by combining building telemetry with weather, occupancy, and tariff data, then writing new setpoints back every fifteen minutes over BACnet and Modbus. myCoreAI grew out of a Vinnova-backed pilot with Stockholm property company SISAB, and its published case studies name real buildings: a 23% electricity cut at Gallerian Nyckeln and a 40% energy reduction at a Stockholm office block.

The boundary is control and disclosure. Like BrainBox AI, Nuuka, and Kiona, myCoreAI optimises by writing directly to the building rather than recommending. Its privacy policy confirms data is processed in Sweden, inside the EU, but Myrspoven doesn't publish certification tracking or pricing, so a buyer comparing the two on paper has to ask directly rather than read the claim.

Weighing other Myrspoven competitors too? BrainBox AI, Nuuka, and Kiona take the same autonomous-control route. See the full field in our best building energy management software comparison.

Side by side

Myrspoven myCoreAI vs FrostLogic Explore, in one table.

FrostLogic Explore and Myrspoven myCoreAI, compared on focus, AI behaviour, coverage, forecasting, certification tracking, data residency and pricing.
FrostLogic ExploreMyrspoven myCoreAI
Core focusSensor intelligence layer: ranked decision queue across BMS, meters, IoTClosed-loop HVAC optimization: AI writes setpoints to heating, cooling and ventilation
How the AI actsRecommends; your team decidesWrites setpoints to the BMS roughly every 15 minutes; no approval step
CoverageReads any existing BMS, meter, or IoT sensor, vendor-neutralConnects to existing BMS over BACnet/Modbus; HVAC-focused
Forecasting and simulation1 hour to 7 days ahead, with confidence bounds, plus what-if simulationNot a published feature beyond setpoint optimization
Certification complianceContinuous: BREEAM, LEED, Nordic SwanNot published
EU data residencyYes (Hetzner, GDPR-native) or self-hostedData processed in Sweden, per Myrspoven's privacy policy
PricingPer building, on requestNot published

Myrspoven claims come from myrspoven.com and Myrspoven's published case studies as of August 2026. "Not published" means we could not find it, which is not proof it does not exist.

Transparent pricing, no sales call to see it

See FrostLogic Explore pricing

Before you shortlist

Five questions that settle Myrspoven vs Explore faster than any comparison.

Ask these on the first call with either vendor, including us. The field narrows itself fast.

  1. Do you want the system writing setpoints, or recommending them? myCoreAI adjusts heating, cooling, and ventilation directly, with no approval step. Explore ranks what to fix and lets your team decide. Match the choice to how much control you're willing to hand over.

  2. Can the vendor show you named, verified results on a building like yours? Myrspoven publishes named case studies, not just percentages, which is rarer than it should be in this category. Ask for one on a similar building type and climate.

  3. Where exactly is your data processed, and under what legal basis? Myrspoven's privacy policy states data is processed in Sweden, inside the EU. Explore is EU-hosted on Hetzner, or self-hosted, and built GDPR-native from the start. Ask either vendor to put the specifics in the contract, not just the policy page.

  4. Do you need continuous certification tracking, or savings evidence for an energy audit? Myrspoven's published materials are strong on measured savings and light on certification tracking, with no mention of BREEAM, LEED, or Nordic Swan. Explore tracks all three continuously against live data.

  5. Are you buying HVAC control, or coverage across the whole building? myCoreAI is focused on heating, cooling, and ventilation. Explore reads whatever BMS, meters, and IoT sensors you already run, HVAC included, so it's the wider net if HVAC isn't your only energy cost.

For the wider field, read our best building energy management software comparison.

Before you ask

Myrspoven vs FrostLogic Explore, the questions we get.

If you want a Nordic HVAC specialist with named case studies and don't mind the system writing its own setpoints, Myrspoven is a strong pick, and we say so plainly. If you want the human to stay in control, or you need coverage beyond HVAC, Explore reads further without touching your controls.

Myrspoven's myCoreAI writes new setpoints into the HVAC and BMS roughly every 15 minutes, closed-loop. Explore reads your BMS, meters, and IoT sensors and hands your team a ranked queue; it never writes to your controls. Explore also forecasts ahead and tracks certification criteria continuously, where Myrspoven's materials focus on measured savings instead.

Both platforms read a building constantly and both publish real energy-saving results. The difference is who acts. Myrspoven's AI adjusts HVAC equipment directly. Explore's AI recommends, and your team makes the call.

Myrspoven's privacy policy states data is processed in Sweden, inside the EU. FrostLogic Explore is EU-hosted on Hetzner, or self-hosted, and built GDPR-native.

Myrspoven doesn't publish pricing anywhere in its materials. FrostLogic Explore is priced per building, on request.

BrainBox AI, Nuuka, and Kiona take the same autonomous-control route as Myrspoven. Clockworks Analytics stops at HVAC diagnosis, and Facilio wraps energy analytics inside a much broader CMMS. Our best building energy management software comparison covers the full roundup.

See the decision queue on your own building.

Book a 20-minute demo on your own data, or start with the free Building Intelligence Score. Either way, we'll tell you straight whether Explore's read-only approach is what you need, or whether Myrspoven's named case studies and autonomous HVAC control is the better fit.

Talk it throughBook a time directlyGet your free Building Intelligence Score